People are talking
We’ve heard lot’s of bad things regarding the new announced EOS 5D mark III as it’s not good enough to justify the price difference from its predecessor. It can be read that the new camera is oriented more towards videographers, that it has less megapixels, etc. First of all I think this camera will be awesome. 5D mark II was great, a great FF camera with only two major downsides. It had lousy auto-focus engine borrowed from the first 5D and it was slow in terms of frames per second. 5D Mark III got the top of the range auto-focus engine, and 6 fps continuous shooting capability ! Even with just that, it makes it a blasting piece of equipment. Something that was for a long time reserved only for Nikon with its D700, it’s now available from Canon. You can now have a great full frame camera with the ability to shoot any action, including professional sport. Of course, Canon surprised us already when he announced the 1D-x with this full frame sport dedicated camera. Canon 5D became a fully capable camera everyone could wish for and you don’t have to give up anything like before with the 5D Mark II.
Megapixels are not everything
The number of megapixels (MP) a camera has, has very little to do with how the image looks. And in practice, plenty of cameras with low megapixel number can make better images than poorer cameras with more megapixels. You may just buy one of those new Nokia 808 smartphones, I’ve heard its camera has like 41 megapixels. MPs are great when you need to crop smaller part of picture and make a poster out of it and when you crop your images a lot, but are also often used by salespeople and manufacturers to make you feel as if your current camera is inadequate and needs to be replaced even if the new cameras each year are only slightly better. Seems like they had right – They might have just put the tone of pixels on EOS 5D Mark III and people would be happy and proud when bragging in front of their friends. But now, your super new Canon 5D mark III has less megapixels than Nikon D800. Oh – what now? Should we not buy it? What’s the coolest feature it has – give us some large numbers!
How about D800 ?
If you’re just a megapixel freak, then you should probably sell your lenses and go for Nikon D800, or even Nokia, at least they got more megapixels and that’s all it matters, right? Don’t get this wrong, no doubt that Nikon made a great camera because they always do, but it seems like Canon and Nikon switched roles. D800 is now what 5D Mark II was when it was announced (a full frame megapixel monster), and 5D Mark III is like D700 when it first arrived. Although, D800 can also produce the maximum of 6fps but only in DX mode and with battery grip attached. It means you’ll have to use only center of the frame like on a 1.5x crop sensor with the downside of pixel loss. As for the sharpness, I believe Canon will have sharper images compared to D800 and better ISO range. That we will find out very soon.
Comparison table EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800
|Canon EOS 5D Mark III||Nikon D800|
|Max resolution||5760 x 3840||7360 x 4912|
|Effective pixels||22.3 megapixels||36.3 megapixels|
|Sensor size||(36 x 24 mm)Full frame||(35.9 x 24 mm) Full frame|
|Processor||DIGIC 5+||Expeed 3|
|Autofocus||Contrast Detect (sensor)
|Autofocus assist lamp||by optional dedicated Speedlite||Yes|
|Number of focus points||61||51|
|ISO||Auto, 100 – 25600 in 1/3 stops, plus 50, 51200, 102400||100 – 6400 in 1, 1/2 or 1/3 EV steps (50 – 25600)|
|File format||JPEG (Exif 2.3 [Exif Print] compliant)
Design rule for Camera File system (2.0)
RAW: RAW, sRAW1, sRAW2 (14bit, Canon original RAW 2nd edition)
Digital Print Order Format [DPOF] Version 1.1 compliant
|NEF (RAW): 12 or 14 bit, lossless compressed, compressed or uncompressed
Clear View II TFT
TFT Color LCD with 170° wide-viewing angle
|Built-in flash||No||Yes (pop-up)|
|Flash X sync speed||1/200 sec||1/250 sec|
|Continuous drive||6 fps||4 fps in FX format (Full frame)
max 6fps in DX format (1.5 Crop) with battery grip
|Storage types||CF Type I (UDMA compatible), SD/SDHC/SDXC||CF (Type I), SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant|
|USB||USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)||USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)|
|Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps)||1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 424 (24 fps)|
Video on Canon 5D Mark III
As seen by far, video control is much improved. That was expected of course but it’s good. You can now monitor the sound on screen and via headphones and even make a simple editing of your recordings. Video Format H.264 with resolutions (1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps)). You can check video examples in article: Canon Presents the New EOS 5D Mark III
Image quality on Canon
Do not expect for image quality to be much improved because the quality so far was very good, although judging by the examples so far, the ISO quality is much improved. We should wait for the RAW files to come out but it should be and will be better.
The disappointed ones are all of those who bought the 5D Mark II for its megapixel number and have used it for studio photography. They expected some crazy megapixel number to be attached with this new camera because they don’t know what to do with the extra 2 fps, and they haven’t even noticed the auto focus performance issues. On the other hand, the film makers and photographers that shoot some kind of motion from time to time will be very glad because instead of having two cameras like 5D Mark II and 7D, could now have only one powerful Camera.
Canon did a great job making this ‘’budget 1D-x’’ and if the pictures come out at least as good as they did on 5D Mark II – it will be a success. Canon EOS 5D Mark III is a full frame camera with respectable auto-focus engine and great video capabilities, able to produce both large size still photos and capture action.